This post is by Tommy Noonan from ReviewMeta, a tool that can be used to identify and filter incentivized reviews for any product available on Amazon, simply by copying and pasting the URL into ReviewMeta.com. This post was originally published on the ReviewMeta blog as Analysis of 7 million Amazon reviews: customers who receive free or discounted item much more likely to write positive review.
- I received this product for free or at a discount in exchange for my honest, unbiased review
- After looking at over 7 million reviews, here’s what we see
- Controlling for product still shows a bias
- Those who write incentivized reviews tend to be less critical
- Volume of incentivized reviews is increasingly sharply
- What about Amazon Vine?
- Where do these reviews come from, and why are they biased?
UPDATE 3 OCTOBER 2016: Amazon has now banned incentivized reviews outright!
If you’ve read reviews on Amazon within the last few years, you’ve surely noticed a disclaimer at the bottom of many that look like this:
I received this product for free or at a discount in exchange for my honest, unbiased review
At ReviewMeta, we call these “incentivized reviews”.
Consumers have growing distrust and even disdain for incentivized reviews, especially when it seems every single one is a glowing 5-star review. We wanted to confirm or deny this seemingly anecdotal opinion, so we analyzed 7 million reviews.
After looking at over 7 million reviews, here’s what we see
We found that reviews containing language that would indicate the reviewer received the item for free, or at a discount, in exchange for a review (incentivized reviews) on average rate the product 0.38 stars higher than reviews that did not contain this disclosure (non-incentivized reviews).
5,071,232 reviews (70%), 4.36 average rating
2,174,802 reviews (30%), 4.74 average rating
With a 0.38 star difference, the impact may appear marginal, however the actual boost in average product rating can be substantial:
Considering that the average product on Amazon is rated around 4.4 stars, a boost from 4.36 to 4.74 stars can mean the difference between a mediocre product and a top rated product. The graph below shows the percentile of products for each average rating:
The distribution of ratings may be even more disturbing:
Incentivized reviewers are 12 times less likely to give a 1-star rating than non-incentivized reviews, and almost 4 times less likely to leave a critical review in general.
Controlling for product still shows a bias
An obvious criticism to the above data is that these reviews are for different products. However, even when controlling for the product we see a similar trend.
We took a look at products that have at least 10 incentivized reviews and 10 non-incentivized reviews (251 products with a total of 609,766 reviews). On average, the incentivized reviewers gave the exact same product 0.29 stars higher than the non-incentivized reviewers:
86% of products received a higher average rating from their incentivized reviews than non-incentivized reviews:
Here we can see the distribution of discrepancies between the incentivized average rating and the non-incentivized average rating:
Here are some products that exemplify incentivized reviewers giving a much higher rating than the non-incentivized reviewers:
- Rxvoit Noise Isolating Earbuds (Incentivized avg: 4.5; non-incentivized avg: 2.9)
- SpaWorks Konjac Exfoliating Facial Cleansing Sponge (Incentivized avg: 4.9; non-incentivized avg: 3.8)
- iPhone 6s Screen Protector (Incentivized avg: 4.8; non-incentivized avg: 3.6)
We also took a closer look into a counterexample (a product that received a lower rating from its incentivized reviews than its non-incentivized reviews) and noticed that when this happens, it can be caused by the non-incentivized reviews being even more biased than the incentivized reviews.
Those who write incentivized reviews tend to be less critical
We also examined the habits of reviewers who participate in these “free product for review” programs. We only looked at reviewers who have written at least 10 reviews total. We found that on average, reviewers who have written at least one incentivized review give an average of 4.56 stars, while reviewers who have never written any incentivized reviews give an average of 4.27 stars.
The chart below shows the percentage of reviewers for each average rating. For example, 14% of reviewers with at least one incentivized review give an average of 4.9 stars for all products they review, while only 6% of reviewers with no incentivized reviews give an average of 4.9 stars for all products they review.
Reviewers With No Incentivized Reviews
Reviewers With At Least One Incentivized Review
Furthermore, reviewers with at least one incentivized review have written an average of 232 reviews each while reviewers who have never written an incentivized review have written an average of 31 reviews each. There appears to be a trend of high-volume reviewers who rate almost everything 5 stars. Here are a few example profiles and current stats as of the time of writing:
- myreview2: 970 reviews, every single one is 5-star.
- Notavailableonhere: 758 reviews, every singe one is 5-star.
- Amazon lover: This reviewer has 4,601 reviews. The first review was written on March 23rd, 2015, so just shy of 10 reviews per day, every day for more than a year. All are 5-star reviews with the exception of 9 that are 4-star, and 2 that are 3-star. (The 3-star reviews did not even contain an incentivization disclosure!)
Volume of incentivized reviews is increasingly sharply
While we’ve only examined a sample of 7 million reviews, we’re still seeing that incentivized reviews are increasing in popularity at an alarming rate. This graph shows the review volume during the last 48 months between May, 2012 and April, 2016:
2 years ago, incentivized reviews accounted for less than 2% of new reviews. Since February of this year, they make up the majority of all new reviews on Amazon.
What about Amazon Vine?
Amazon Vine is Amazon’s in-house free-product for review system. It is invite-only, often focuses on larger-value items and can even require the reviewers to return the item. Amazon Vine reviews are NOT included in our incentivized group because they are NOT required to leave the “free product” disclaimer since their reviews are already labeled with the “Vine” badge.
Amazon Vine reviews make up roughly 4% of the reviews in our dataset, and give an average of 4.2 stars (compared to 4.74 from incentivized reviewers and 4.36 from non-incentivized), so at first glance, it seems to be much better controlled than their “review club” counterparts. We’ll be doing an in-depth analysis on Vine reviews shortly.
Where do these reviews come from, and why are they biased?
Incentivized reviews are a new and rapidly growing breed of review. While some people label them as “fake”, incentivized reviews don’t technically deserve it because they are likely from real people who had a real experience with the actual product. However, the data still shows they still have a bias – despite their claims to the contrary.
Dozens of “review clubs” (3rd party services) have popped up in the last few years to facilitate the exchange of free or discounted products for “honest” reviews. This is fair game according to Amazon’s Terms of Service as long as the reviewer discloses this fact.
No matter what explanation you choose to believe, it’s hard to argue with the data. Some might try to debunk our entire analysis by citing evidence that they (or a friend/family member) accept free products in exchange for reviews, and they always leave 100% honest feedback. We aren’t calling them a liar; of course there will be “honest” reviewers who participate in these programs. But this is the very definition of anecdotal evidence, and our analysis is on the bigger picture.