This post is by Leah McHugh, an ecommerce consultant for ecommerceChris.com.
In 2016, Amazon quietly made a change to its Product UPC and GTINs policy (Seller Central login required). It now states:
We verify the authenticity of product UPCs by checking the GS1 database. UPCs that do not match the information provided by GS1 will be considered invalid. We recommend obtaining your UPCs directly from GS1 (and not from other third parties selling UPC licenses) to ensure the appropriate information is reflected in the GS1 database.
What does that mean for sellers?
Well, first you need to understand why Amazon has made this change. Amazon has millions of duplicate listings, where someone has slapped their own barcode onto an existing product in the catalog. Duplicate listings are not good for buyer experience. It confuses customers and dilutes product reviews.
The GS1 policy gives Amazon tighter control over what constitutes a valid listing and reduces the chance of duplicate listings. How? Let’s take a look at how barcodes work.
Barcodes 101
GS1 (Global Standards 1) supply companies with a company prefix, used in GTINs (Global Trade Item Numbers).
UPCs (Universal Product Codes), EANs (European Article Numbers) and JANs (Japanese Article Numbers) are all different kinds of GTINs
GTINs are then turned into Barcodes which are a machine-readable code in the form of numbers and a pattern of parallel lines of varying widths.
The first seven to 11 digits in a barcode, is a unique identifier known as a company prefix. The company prefix identifies the manufacturer or brand owner of the product. This is used to create UPCs for your products.
The ONLY place you can buy legitimate UPCs is through GS1.
The problem with buying UPCs from resellers is that they are selling you someone else’s (hopefully unused) code. The company prefix will not identify you, it will identify the original owner of the UPC. So, if you sell apparel and your code identifies a liquor company, that isn’t going to fly with Amazon anymore.
To be clear, resold barcodes aren’t illegal. I consider UPCs obtained from any source other than GS1 to be grey market. As of 2002, GS1’s license agreement has stated:
The license agreement for our membership prohibits any use of the Company Prefix other than for the use of the owner company, including but not limited to selling, sharing, leasing, sub-dividing, or re-selling the Company Prefix.
Most resellers are selling codes obtained prior to 2002. So you are not breaking the law by using them. However, you are breaking Amazon policy if you use these codes on Amazon.
If you want to see who your UPCs belong to, you can check them on GS1’s Global Electronic Party Information Registry.
So far, Amazon’s enforcement of the UPC policy has been piecemeal. At this time it looks like they are checking the manufacturer field, brand and title to match against GS1. Amazon has started:
- Automatically checking UPCs against their list of Designated Brands Requiring UPCs when a new listing is being created.
- Checking existing listings that cite a Designated Brand as the manufacturer, or mentions them in the title.
- Checking UPCs manually when a seller is under investigation for other reasons, such as misuse of ASIN Variations.
What if your brand name is different from your company name, so it doesn’t match GS1? You need to register with GS1 using your legal company name (or DBA for sole trader). You can then add brand information using GS1’s data hub.
Listing Branded Products That Aren’t Your Brand
If you’re listing a branded product, that is NOT your brand, then you should be using the barcode supplied by the manufacturer.
Amazon policy forbids adding your own UPC to someone else’s product. Your listing and likely your seller account will be shut down. You may even hear from the brand owner’s lawyers. Just don’t do it.
What if the products I’m reselling don’t have a barcode? Contact your supplier. There is no official publicly available list of barcodes, as there is no requirement for registering individual UPCs. Your best source is the manufacturer or brand owner.
If the products do not have GTINs, you can apply for an exemption from Amazon’s UPC requirement. You need a letter from the brand owner confirming that their products do not have a GTIN as well as a link to the product website, or images of the products. You can apply for an exemption here (Seller Central login required).
Listing Your Own Private Label Products
You should ONLY be buying your UPCs from GS1. They will assign you a company prefix, that will identify you as a brand owner. Any company can buy a prefix – you do not need to be incorporated.
May I buy cheap UPCs from eBay or another reseller? No. No, you may not. Go back and read Barcodes 101. If you buy UPCs from a reseller, the codes will identify someone else as the brand owner.
Should you ever decide to sell your products to major retailers, they will only accept GS1 issued UPCs with your company prefix.
May I list my private label products without a UPC? In certain categories, you can apply for an exemption. Amazon will assign your products a Global Catalog Identifier (GCID), which can be used in place of a UPC. Here’s the requirement for applying for an exemption (Seller Central login required).
Listing Bundles
If you’re creating bundles of your own private label products, use a unique GS1 UPC.
NOTE: The UPC must be unique to the bundle – you can not use a UPC from one of the items within the bundle.
For bundles of products from multiple brands, you can apply for a GTIN exemption (see above)
For bundles of products from the same brand, for which you are not the brand owner, you should request a UPC from the brand owner. Note: bundles with products from the same brand are considered as branded products. So, you could also request a UPC exemption with a support letter from the brand owner.
Listings with Incorrect Barcodes
What if I have existing listings with “bad” UPC codes?
I’m guessing that when you started out on Amazon, someone told you that you could buy cheap UPCs from eBay. I still see this advice given regularly by so-called Amazon experts. So, chances are, you have existing listings with not-so-legit UPCs. Now what?
Resellers: is there already a listing with the correct information? List against that and shut down your listing with the incorrect UPC.
If there isn’t a correct listing, you should still shut down or merge your listing, and relist with the correct information.
Private labels: At this point, it looks like Amazon is targeting new listings and sellers listing other brands. However, Amazon’s wording is very clear that this policy applies to all UPCs:
All invalid product UPC listings will be removed and may result in your ASIN creation or selling privileges being temporarily, or permanently, removed.
It is only a matter of time before they begin cleaning up their entire catalog.
I’ve asked around internally and have yet to get an answer on the right way (or Amazon sanctioned way) to handle this. So, as I see it, here are your options:
- If you have Brand Registry, then you do not need to list with a UPC. If you set your key attribute as UPC, then you should change your key attribute. Contact Seller Support and request support with Brand Registry. Ask them to change your key attribute to whatever you want to change it to. You should get a response from the Brand Registry team about whether the change is successful or not.
- The GTIN field is editable in Seller Central. I know Sellers that have changed this field on existing listings without issue, but I don’t know if that will be the case across the board.
- You could create a new, correct listing, and ask Catalog to merge it with the old listing.
Summing Up
Amazon is trying to clean up their catalog. It’s in their interest, and it’s in their customer’s interest, to maintain the integrity of their product listings.
As a seller, you need to make sure your seller account is policy compliant. Weigh the expense of following the rules against the potential lost profits that come with blocked listings and account suspension.
You decide whether it’s worth it.
This post was by Leah McHugh, an ecommerce consultant for ecommerceChris.com.
This post was first published in June 2016 and fully updated in January 2018.
Comments
Great post Leah. Am I correct in assuming that one UPC must have only one listing on Amazon? If yes, is there any suggestion for listing products with fitment data such as printer ink, laptop batteries etc.?
The issue here is that the better customer experience is to put the fitment data into the title and list one UPC multiple times with different titles e.g “HP Pavillion dv7-1000 battery”, “HP Pavillion dv7-2000 battery” etc.
With the new UPC policy could we create multiple listings with different titles but the same UPC?
When there
Unfortunately, some manufacturers do use the same UPC for multiple products, despite the fact that UPC is supposed to stand for UNIQUE Product Code.
You will need to put in a request to the catalog team to split the listing, and they will ask you to provide the product information. The process is outlined here https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=hp_left_sib?ie=UTF8&nodeId=201961060
Sorry, quick pop in, UPC actually stands for “Universal Product Code”, not “Unique Product Code”. See Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Product_Code
We have thousands of UPC’s purchased from a third party. We use them to create our own bundles of mixed branded products. When we check the UPC’s for ownership information, the GS1 system responds that there is no record found for owner information (GS1 Japan). Since the results do not find any conflicting ownership information, I’m wondering if those bundles will be safe? We are also updating all of those bundles with our company name for the manufacturer and brand fields, and have removed brand names from the titles and created more generic titles.
Without seeing the actual codes, I can only make an educated guess.
If the company prefix does not come up in GEPIR ( GS1’s Company Database), then my guess is that they are not legitimate GTINs or they have expired. Either way, this would make them invalid.
I would suggest contacting GS1 for further information.
Hi Leah, You are correct. That is the key to using legitimate and valid UPC’s or EAN’s. A valid barcode number will have a record in GS1’s database. As I have stated in a previous post here, I am a barcode reseller, having been in business now for 11 years. My customers have not had any problems listing on Amazon using barcodes purchased from me, because I provide them with GS1 compliant, valid UPC barcode numbers. As I stated before what my customers have found is that Amazon is checking for the validity of the barcode number, not a “name… Read more »
Would they need to register a UPC they bought from you with GS1? Thanks
Mark,
GS1 will not register the UPCs you buy from Robert. Companies, like Roberts, operate in an area which GS1 does not approve. I disagree with Robert’s comments since Amazon is now using GS1 US’s Data Hub to match the Company Prefix to the brand. Resellers use words like compliant and valid but they really are not the best source for information.
Where did you purchase your UPC codes?
Regardless of what some of the reseller have said, you really need to get your own Company Prefix directly from GS1 US. If tomorrow Amazon makes another change , you would be silly to risk getting delisted.
The big problem in the catagory of toys and toy manufactures is that the manufacturers use the same UPC code on many related items. An example would be in diecast cars where a manufactures list the same code for every color or for the same car that is stock and one that is custom. They also sometimes offer the same item with different UPC codes depending on the packaging or special promotion they have offered. The variations can differ greatly and using the manufactures UPC code on Amazon makes it difficult for a buyer to find what they are seaching… Read more »
I have seen nothing of this policy in the US. I cannot imagine it will fly very well with manufacturers or sellers in the US. Many manufacturers use recycled numbers – their own or others they have bought. The UPCs are unique to them but no longer match the GTIN database. It also would not be beneficial for consumers as it eliminates lots of bundled buying choices and eliminates a huge part of Amazon’s catalog. It will be interesting to see what happens.
Hi Jack,
The relevant policy page for the US is Amazon’s Product UPCs and GTINs page (Seller Central login required): https://sellercentral.amazon.com/gp/help/help.html?ie=UTF8&itemID=200317470&ref_=sm_200317470_bred_200494020&
Can you explain this in more detail? “The least safe option is to bundle items of different brands, listing the bundle under your own private label, and your own GS1 issued UPC. This is the current loophole which some sellers are taking advantage of to create their own unique listings. I can see this practice coming under scrutiny as more and more sellers attempt to exploit it.” Why do you think that using different brands in a bundle is an issue or an exploit? For example, a S’More’s bundle. Marshmallows, Chocolate, and Graham Crackers. All 3 from different manufacturers. Amazon… Read more »
I agree that a bundle like the one your described provides value to the consumer.
The reason I think it will become an issue is because we are already seeing sellers exploit the bundle policy to create duplicate listings and to get around the UPC requirements for Designated Brands Requiring UPCs. For example, a branded item that has been put in a “special” box and then is listed under the sellers PL.
Ah, I see what you mean I think. So a PL seller has a registered brand, but begins using their UPC codes for bundles, thus making them their own branded product even though it’s really just a pack of smores.
One thing that seems monopolistic to me is that unused UPC’s can’t be sold to a third party and then registered with GS1. I suppose it would be an administrative nightmare. Still, they’re the only ones that can sell new UPC’s, thus artificially inflating the price beyond their real value.
Hi Leah I started out with private label products last year on Amazon. I bought UPC codes from cheap-upc-barcode.com as that was what was recommended to me at the time. I registered my brand name with Amazon and have UPC as the key attribute. I have built up a lot of reviews on some of the products and it would be a shame to lose them all and start again, especially when newer competitors in the same categories are catching up with me review wise. But I know it would be worse to have my account shut down. You mentioned… Read more »
Thanks Norm, As you are already enrolled in Brand Registry, you could you the GCID which is a 16 character ID Amazon assigned to your listings. You can find it in your inventory report. You would need to contact the catalog and ask them to change your key attribute. The GCID can be used across countries. If you have no intention of selling in stores, then I wouldn’t bother using a UPC if you are able to use the exemption. But, if you choose to purchase from GS1, they have offices in most European countries, so you are able to… Read more »
Hi Leah,
Is it not possible to purchase new UPC codes from GS1 and then just change the barcodes round on your existing listings rather than deleting the whole listing.
Or will a change in barcode mean you loose all your data for that listing?
Thanks
Hi Abz,
Unfortunately, it is not possible to change the UPC on an existing listing on Amazon. To change the UPC you need to create a new listing with the correct information and delete the incorrect listing.
Alternatively, if it is your Private Label you can apply for Brand Registry and use something other than UPC as your key attribute. That would remove the incorrect UPC’s from your existing listings.
Hi Leah,
GS1 have UPC and EAN. If I sell only on Amazon usa, which one should I buy?
Thanks!
Hi Rebecca,
GS1 sell the prefix, which can be used to create both UPCs and EANs.
However, UPCs are used in the USA.
UPDATE: Speedy Barcode has added the following verbiage to their site, addressing Amazon’s policy change: “Amazon has recently updated their company policy and put a barcode ownership verification process in place. At this time, Amazon is using GS1’s GEPIR database as the sole means of verification. We have contacted Amazon to let them know that the database they are using is not current and does not reflect correct ownership information for all of the barcode numbers GS1 has listed, but as per an email from them, they have no plans to change their process. At this time, you have no… Read more »
We dealt with Speedy Barcode in the past and they have no clue what they are talking about. Go straight to GS1 US.
Absolutely not correct!
As I have stated here before
Amazon is not, I repeat not doing name checks in GS1’s database
What they are checking for is the validity of the code itself
If it is a valid code, the barcode number will have a record in the database, if it is fake, there will be no record
Validity, not name match!
Robert,
Do you work for Amazon? There isn’t an official barcode database. GS1 maintains a searchable database of Company Prefixes which can be used to validate If a prefix is uniquely assigned to a brand. I do not work for Amazon nor GS1 but our other retail trading partners follow this process.
Hi Leah,
When I’m setting up my company prefix on the GS1 website, do I put my importing LLC as the company name? Or do I put my brand name (very different from my LLC)? I read through their FAQ but couldn’t find the answer. Would prefer LLC, but trying to select the option that won’t get me flagged/suspended by Amazon later.
Thanks for a great article by the way.
Thank you, Billy.
You must register with GS1 using your legal company name. And your should register a DBA for your brand name.
If it came to your listings being blocked because your DBA didn’t match your company name in GS1, you could very easily provide your DBA paperwork and GS1 certificate, proving your codes are legit.
Our entity has a GS1 certificate that we use to assign UPCs to a variety f Brands that we sell… per note above, can I ‘Register MULTIPLE DBAs’ to cover this Amazon requirement? Thks, Ron